|
A Day in the Duplicitous Life of the Bush
Administration
April 2, 2004
Everything you need to know about the Bush administration’s
unparalleled vindictiveness, secrecy and deceit is neatly
summarized in the April 2, 2004 edition of the
New
York Times. There are no fewer than SEVEN
stories about White House wrong-doing and duplicity.
Individually, each is staggering; taken together, they paint a
disgusting picture of President Bush’s utter contempt for truth,
democracy and the American people.
In no particular order:
“Bush Aides Block Clinton's Papers From 9/11 Panel”
“The commission investigating the Sept. 11 attacks said on
Thursday that it was pressing the White House to explain why the
Bush administration had blocked thousands of pages of classified
foreign policy and counterterrorism documents from former
President Bill Clinton's White House files from being turned
over to the panel's investigators.
The White House confirmed on Thursday that it had withheld a
variety of classified documents from Mr. Clinton's files that
had been gathered by the National Archives over the last two
years in response to requests from the commission, which is
investigating intelligence and law enforcement failures before
the attacks…”
“2 Decline to Testify on Drug Cost”
“A senior White House official and the former Medicare
administrator, central figures in a controversy over the cost of
the new prescription drug law, declined to appear before a House
committee Thursday, defying Democrats who had sought their
testimony.
Citing executive privilege, the White House refused to send
Doug Badger, special assistant to the president for health
policy, to testify before the House Ways and Means Committee.
The former Medicare administrator, Thomas A. Scully, who no
longer works for the government, wrote the committee a letter
saying he had been busy traveling and would be ‘unable to
appear’…”
“Federal Judge Orders Release of Documents of White House”
“A federal judge ruled Thursday that the Bush administration
must release thousands of pages of documents related to a White
House task force that met behind closed doors to develop a
national energy policy.
The ruling, by Judge Paul L. Friedman of Federal District
Court here, was a victory for the Natural Resources Defense
Council, an environmental lobbying group, and Judicial Watch, a
conservative legal group. The two organizations have been trying
to find out whether the task force, headed by Vice President
Dick Cheney, was heavily influenced by energy executives and
lobbyists…”
“Prosecutors Are Said to Have Expanded Inquiry Into Leak of
C.I.A. Officer's Name”
“Prosecutors investigating whether someone in the Bush
administration improperly disclosed the identity of a C.I.A.
officer have expanded their inquiry to examine whether White
House officials lied to investigators or mishandled classified
information related to the case, lawyers involved in the case
and government officials say...”
Paul Krugman: “Smear
Without Fear”
“On Monday, Mr. Letterman ran a video clip of a boy yawning
and fidgeting during a speech by George Bush. It was harmless
stuff; a White House that thinks it's cute to have Mr. Bush make
jokes about missing W.M.D. should be able to handle a little
ribbing about boring speeches.
CNN ran the Letterman clip on Tuesday, just before a
commercial. Then the CNN anchor Daryn Kagan came back to inform
viewers that the clip was a fake: "We're being told by the White
House that the kid, as funny as he was, was edited into that
video." Later in the day, another anchor amended that: the boy
was at the rally, but not where he was shown in the video…But
here's the really interesting part: CNN backed down, but it told
Mr. Letterman that Ms. Kagan "misspoke," that the White House
was not the source of the false claim. (So who was? And if the
claim didn't come from the White House, why did CNN run with it
without checking?)
In short, CNN passed along a smear that it attributed to the
White House. When the smear backfired, it declared its previous
statements inoperative and said the White House wasn't
responsible. Sound familiar?…”
“Senators Fault Mercury Pollution Proposal”
“Forty-five senators and 10 state attorneys general asked the
Environmental Protection Agency on Thursday to withdraw its
proposal on how to regulate mercury emissions from coal-fired
power plants and replace it with a more stringent proposal.
The agency said in December that it would abandon a Clinton
administration plan in favor of a market system that would let
plants buy and sell the rights to emit mercury…”
“White House Undermined Chemical Tests, Report Says”
“A report released by a House committee on Thursday describes
how the Bush administration worked with the United States
chemical industry to undermine a European plan that would
require all manufacturers to test industrial chemicals for their
effect on public health before they were sold in Europe.
The administration had said publicly that the proposal last
year would threaten the $20 billion in chemicals that the United
States exports to Europe each year because the cost of testing
would be prohibitive. Five years in the making, the proposal,
which was revised and is still under consideration, would shift
the burden to prove the safety of chemicals onto manufacturers
instead of governments…”
If these stories had come out one day earlier, you would no
doubt assume it was an April Fool's prank. Unfortunately, the
joke is still on us... |